(Image: Rise, Jan Richardson/The Painted Prayerbook)
The University Church in Yale
Sermon
June 9, 2013
Today we dive back into the gospel of Luke
right where we left off last week,
continuing a narrative journey we will follow
all summer
as we settle into “ordinary time,”
the weeks between Pentecost and Advent.
Last week we watched as Jesus set out on his
adult ministry,
healing the beloved slave of a centurion
in plain sight of bystanders.
This week,
we rejoin the crowd following Jesus as he moves
on,
passing by the town of Nain,
where Jesus performs another miracle:
raising the deceased son of a widow
and reuniting the two of them.
Talking about biblical miracles
is akin to cooking with a very sharp knife:
powerful in a sure and steady hand,
but sharp and painful if mishandled.
It tends to be difficult to talk about miracles
because people have very different opinions
about them.
Most of us here today are accustomed to living
in a world
where the dead stay dead,
the sick stay sick unless they receive
appropriate treatment,
the poor stay poor,
and injustices have a troubling way
of becoming embedded in our customs and laws.
So we tiptoe around the miracles of Jesus,
trying to make room for them in belief systems
often based on empiricism and reasoning.
Some people seek detailed scientific
explanations of biblical miracles,
combing the archaeological record for anything
that might support them.
Others dismiss miracles
as symbolic stories without any basis in
reality.
Still others are convinced that they occurred
exactly as the Bible narrates.
The truth, I think, lies somewhere in between.
As Jesus shows us today,
the heart of miracles is not their supernatural
nature:
it is the compelling alteration of the fabric
of the ordinary,
the way they become vehicles of good news
for those who need it most.
Real miracles are not made obsolete by the
intervening millennia –
instead, they remain immediate, authentic, and
revolutionary.
Take, for example, the story of Jesus and the
widow at Nain,
walking to the cemetery with the body of her
only son.
While the widow's grief tugs at our hearts,
it can be all too easy to react to her
situation with a sense of distance.
Women of the ancient world who lost their male
partners and their adult sons
effectively lost all resources to support
themselves.
When the men in their lives died,
these women died as well:
a social death, without the ties of family,
without a financial safety net.
Widowed, childless women were condemned
to spiral downward into poverty, illness, abuse,
and an early death,
already abandoned by their society.
These issues seem distant,
but they are immediate.
If you have ever had an experience with a
medical crisis, credit card debt, or unemployment,
you know that even people who are clothed and
housed and fed
live on a knife's edge:
at any point in our lives,
just one crisis
can catapult us into deep poverty,
homelessness, and hopelessness.
Just as in the ancient Near East,
plenty of socially-sanctioned vulnerabilities
are present in our own society,
affecting both women AND men:
women lack equality in society and the
workplace,
consistently earning less than men for the same
labor;
higher education is difficult to access without
incurring lifelong debt;
one spouse frequently depends on the other
for household income and health insurance;
aging parents increasingly rely on their adult
children for emotional and financial support.
When one or two of the key supports are removed
from our delicately balanced lives,
we suddenly realize that the widow at Nain is
quite common in this world,
and she is closer to us than we ever thought
possible.
Today, she is still in desperate need of a
miracle.
The widow walks among us.
She is the middle-aged woman
stunned at falling from a middle-class life
into homelessness in a matter of months
as her savings evaporated and she lost her
house to foreclosure.
"I don't know what to do," she says.
"I have nothing. I haven't even learned
how to be homeless yet."
Her spare clothing and books,
which were her last remaining scraps of
dignity,
were stolen when she left them unattended in
the local shelter.
The widow weeps among us.
She is the man sobbing at the hospital bedside
of his wife,
who is barely alive following her sudden cardiac
arrest.
He is disabled and unable to work.
She had worked bagging groceries,
providing minimal insurance coverage and income
for the two of them.
They have no children; their families are
estranged.
The man weeps ceaselessly,
knowing that his wife will not recover
and that the medical bills will devastate him.
He fears losing his home;
he will even be unable to care for their
beloved cat,
whose photo he kisses like an icon.
These scenes are repeated daily.
The widow of Nain is traveling the bleak road
from the center of town to the cemetery
every day,
knowing she has little reason to return home
again.
Maybe you have known her;
maybe you have been her.
Or maybe you are one of the many who have
become immune to her presence
simply because she is so common.
Here in New Haven, for example,
we confront poverty on a daily basis.
Your trip from home to work or class or lab
might take you through blighted neighborhoods,
which gradually become invisible as you learn
to dismiss them as "sketchy."
You might walk along the New Haven Green in the
morning,
simply accepting that some of the people lying
on the benches
have spent the night there.
You might have learned to keep your face as
immovable as granite
as you walk right by panhandlers,
pretending they are invisible.
And when once your heart cracked a little bit
every time you saw need,
you now begin to assume
that welfare and food stamps will take care of
the need,
and you protect yourself from the emotional
assault of witnessing suffering:
otherwise, your heart would shatter.
This is a significant characteristic of a
condition called compassion fatigue.
Caregivers like nurses, doctors, social
workers, and yes, ministers are prone to it --
particularly if they work with people grappling
with trauma, death, poverty, and suffering.
It prevents them from being able to empathize
with their clients and patients
and is thus highly dangerous.
You could say that we live in a
compassion-fatigued society,
which is not so different from first-century
Palestine:
we know that the systemic injustice in our
culture causes profound human suffering,
but we assume we can never win the struggle for
justice.
We continue to walk past panhandlers, victims
of mental illness, and people on their way to homeless shelters:
there's nothing we can do.
My housemate returned to New Haven from Brazil
last week
and shared an image of her trip
that has stayed with me for the past several
days.
As her tour bus drove into the city of Rio,
it passed mile after mile of favelas,
the extensive slums surrounding many Brazilian
cities.
"I knew people lived like that in other
parts of the world," she said to me,
"but I never really understood that kind
of poverty."
Even so, most of the other Americans on the bus
carried on talking and laughing,
numb to the thousands of shacks surrounding the
highway.
This, then, is why we desperately need Jesus to
work a miracle in our lives:
we have developed compassion fatigue,
and countless human beings are suffering as a
result.
When Jesus comes walking toward Nain in the
gospel of Luke,
he has already accumulated a considerable
crowd.
They wonder if he is Elijah returned;
they wonder if he is the person whose coming
John the Baptist foretold.
Who knows what the people in the crowd might
have thought when they encountered the funeral procession,
one woman with much of the town following a
shrouded body to the cemetery?
Perhaps they ignored her and were focused on
Jesus,
waiting to see what sort of sign this unusual
man would perform next.
It was probably a shock, then,
when Jesus stopped,
said, Rise,
and sent the dead man home with his mother.
Three miracles happened that day;
there were three resurrections.
The first and most apparent was the widow's son,
victim of an untimely death.
The second was the widow, victim of a social
system that would condemn her to total poverty.
And the third, I think -- only suggested in
Luke's gospel -- was the resurrection of the crowd.
Luke notes that Jesus is moved with compassion
to intervene in the hopeless funeral
procession.
Though compassion fatigue may have blunted the
feelings of the crowd,
Jesus's action had broken the scaly shell
around their hearts,
demonstrating in the strongest terms that it
was no longer enough
to accept that some people are fated to suffer
through no fault of their own.
The real recipients of the Good News were the
impoverished.
What might this look like today?
The first two resurrections are clear enough:
the recovery of a loved one gravely ill,
employment secured, the rent paid, disaster averted.
But the third resurrection,
the whole reason for the very public nature of
the miracle:
this one is ours,
the death of our complacency
and the resurrection of our compassion.
The resurrection of our compassion
means BELIEVING that the good news is truly
extended to all people,
even the ones we have learned to ignore.
It means risking heartbreak and despair
in order to be as open and vulnerable as
Christ:
able to truly see the suffering we confront on
a daily basis
and to respond to it.
It means we cannot accept poverty and need as
givens,
just as Jesus refused to accept the widow's
likely fate
after the death of her only son.
The resurrection of a dead body on its way to burial
is remarkable and meaningful, to be certain.
But by this single miracle in first-century
Palestine,
Jesus extends new life to all of us in the most
essential and ordinary of ways,
a miracle that renews itself for us daily.
Christ looks into our hardened hearts,
and he says, Rise.
He sees the raw wounds of humiliation, the loss
of dignity that many experience in poverty,
and he says, Rise.
He beholds the fragility of our good
intentions,
and he says, Rise.
He knows the poor all over the world,
from New Haven to the favelas, for who they are --
beloved children of God --
and he says, Rise.
And he looks upon each of us in this room
today,
and he says to all of us and each of us,
Rise.
A M E N
